httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Max Bowsher" <>
Subject Re: Proposal: Make --with-program-name NOT rename httpd.conf, but DO rename
Date Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:13:32 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> No, this makes no sense, if I build httpd13 and httpd2 I expect
> two different conf files.

Then, how do you manage the other files that apache installs into the same 
directory as httpd.conf ?

And, what do you do about the pidfiles, which both default to 
/var/run/ ?
(Possibly, you just use the config file to change one, but I'd rather my 
httpd package have workable compiled-in defaults, not ones which _need_ 
runtime fixup.


> At 10:01 AM 2/20/2005, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Proposal: Make --with-program-name NOT rename httpd.conf, but DO rename
>> Since apache installs many config files, these config files are never 
>> placed
>> directly into /etc, since that would be too messy. Rather they go into a
>> specific subdirectory. Therefore, renaming httpd.conf does not serve to
>> avoid conflicts with other apache installations, since the rest of the
>> subdirectory would still conflict. It just makes it less obvious exactly
>> what the file is.
>> However, PidFiles usually do get placed in one system-global directory, 
>> so
>> if the program name was changed to avoid conflicts, it is likely that the
>> pid file will need to be changed as well. Therefore I think the pidfile
>> default name should be <programname>.pid, not
>> Does this seem sensible?
>> Thanks.
>> Max. 

View raw message