Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41585 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2005 21:34:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 31 Jan 2005 21:34:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 92291 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2005 21:34:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 91514 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jan 2005 21:34:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 91499 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jan 2005 21:34:50 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from sinclair.provo.novell.com (HELO sinclair.provo.novell.com) (137.65.81.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:34:49 -0800 Received: from INET-PRV-MTA by sinclair.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:34:47 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.4 Beta Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:34:38 -0700 From: "Brad Nicholes" To: Subject: Re: Time for 2.0.53? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >>> jessh@ptc.com Monday, January 31, 2005 2:26:09 PM >>> >I'd love to see the LDAP socket timeout configuration stuff make it in >for 2.0.53! > >-- >Jess Holle > >Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > >> Any opposition to doing a tag and roll of 2.0.53 soon? (Yes, I >> volunteer to be RM.) How about targetting next Tuesday (2/8) for >> 2.0.53? I can lay down the candidate tarball on Friday morning, so >> whatever backports are merged by then make it. =) >> >> Do we want closure on Jeff's proxy chunking patch for 2.0.53? -- justin >> Me too ;) Any voters out there? I've already cast my vote (Obviously) >From the looks of the STATUS file, there appears to be a number of backports with 3 +1's that just need to be backported. Brad