Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76407 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2005 17:30:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 17:30:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 8685 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2005 17:30:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8657 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2005 17:30:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 8644 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2005 17:30:07 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from mercury.ex.ac.uk (HELO mercury.ex.ac.uk) (144.173.6.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:30:06 -0800 Received: from [144.173.228.126] (helo=kenny) by mercury.ex.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Ct82N-00t0aR-Lq for dev@httpd.apache.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:30:03 +0000 Received: from rowe by kenny with local (Exim 4.24) id 1Ct82N-0001DU-Iy for dev@httpd.apache.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:30:03 +0000 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: mod include behaviour Message-Id: From: John Rowe Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:30:03 +0000 X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Can somebody confirm this is a deliberate feature? If I write: The '>' gets sent to the client as a literal '>', which means that I need to write: The reason for this seems to be the '1' as the final call to ap_ssi_get_tag_and_value in handle_set in mod_include.c This isn't what I expect from the docs and it seems an extremely strange thing for a _server_ to be doing. At the least it should be documented (and maybe made optional?) John