Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> William A. Rowe, Jr. said:
>
> > For a stable branch though - more often such changes should just
> > be -vetoed- instead of worked-around. Packaging changes would
> > seem to signal breakage, not a reason for a workaround.
>
> > -1 not CTR. Lazy consensus. Propose, give 3 - 5 days (what
> > ever your schedule best provides) and then commit. If folks
> > object they will speak up - if not - then you aren't hampered.
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
> +1.
>
Agreed. But I was also +1 on the original.
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"There 10 types of people: those who read binary and everyone else."
|