Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24280 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2004 08:28:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Dec 2004 08:28:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 38087 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2004 08:28:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38063 invoked by uid 500); 13 Dec 2004 08:28:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38048 invoked by uid 99); 13 Dec 2004 08:28:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from force-elite.com (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (216.255.199.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:28:22 -0800 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [10.10.10.101] (199.5.172.2:49580) by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:28:19 -0800 Message-ID: <41BD5301.9090004@force-elite.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:29:53 -0700 From: Paul Querna User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Towards a generic database connection API References: <20041213072715.GG15811@nibiru.borg.metux.de> <41BD4A26.5070805@force-elite.com> <20041213082236.GP15811@nibiru.borg.metux.de> In-Reply-To: <20041213082236.GP15811@nibiru.borg.metux.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Paul Querna wrote: > > > >>LGPL`ed, and I have never seen it used from an Apache Module. > > something bad on lgpl ? Yes, but this is not the place to dicuss philosophical differences on open source. >>It looks quite heavy... the APR DBD api is just a loose wrapper >>around the low level calls, its a different target than unixODBC, >>which looks to be much much more. > > As long as httpd brings its own expat and pcre, we dont need to > discuss about the heavyliness of unixodbc. This is irrelevant to the proposed addition of DBD to the APR-Util API. -Paul