httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roy T. Fielding <>
Subject Re: svn commit: r111386 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/httpd.h /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c
Date Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:36:04 GMT
On Dec 9, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Thursday, December 9, 2004 11:26 AM -0500 Geoffrey Young 
> <> wrote:
>> well, I guess it depends on whether the goal is to help (for some 
>> definition
>> of help) support official HTTP variants (if indeed that's what 3229 
>> is), or
>> just for things we actually take the time to implement fully.
> I think it only makes sense for us to have the status lines for the 
> things we actually implement.  I'm not going to veto it, but just that 
> I think it's foolish for us to add status lines for the goofy 
> 'variants' of HTTP that we'll never support.  IETF's stamp of approval 
> means little as they've produced their fair share of crappy RFCs 
> trying to hop on the HTTP bandwagon.

I will veto it.  -1.  I consider 3229 to be harmful to HTTP and do not 
wish to
support it in the current form.  Folks can still implement it with 
if needed.


View raw message