httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roy T. Fielding <field...@gbiv.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r111386 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/CHANGES /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/httpd.h /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/http/http_protocol.c
Date Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:36:04 GMT
On Dec 9, 2004, at 8:46 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Thursday, December 9, 2004 11:26 AM -0500 Geoffrey Young 
> <geoff@modperlcookbook.org> wrote:
>
>> well, I guess it depends on whether the goal is to help (for some 
>> definition
>> of help) support official HTTP variants (if indeed that's what 3229 
>> is), or
>> just for things we actually take the time to implement fully.
>
> I think it only makes sense for us to have the status lines for the 
> things we actually implement.  I'm not going to veto it, but just that 
> I think it's foolish for us to add status lines for the goofy 
> 'variants' of HTTP that we'll never support.  IETF's stamp of approval 
> means little as they've produced their fair share of crappy RFCs 
> trying to hop on the HTTP bandwagon.

I will veto it.  -1.  I consider 3229 to be harmful to HTTP and do not 
wish to
support it in the current form.  Folks can still implement it with 
extensions
if needed.

....Roy


Mime
View raw message