httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Enrico Weigelt <weig...@metux.de>
Subject Re: PCRE in 2.1/2.2
Date Mon, 13 Dec 2004 07:39:07 GMT
* Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote:

<snip>
> > Is there any reason to keep libpcre in the httpd tree?
> 
> untar && configure && make must "just work" on any random Unix system.

shot yourself. 
apache2 requires expat, which is less common than pcre.

<snip>
> Those are bugs which can be fixed by optionally using an external PCRE
> library (configure --with-pcre) and/or properly namespacing the symbols
Are you shure this option really exists ?

> defined by the bundled copy of PCRE.  Removing the bundled PCRE is not
> necessary to that goal or otherwise desirable, though.
The original question was exactly the opposite: is it necessary always
to have a bundled pcre ?


cu
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 Enrico Weigelt    ==   metux IT service

  phone:     +49 36207 519931         www:       http://www.metux.de/
  fax:       +49 36207 519932         email:     contact@metux.de
  cellphone: +49 174 7066481
---------------------------------------------------------------------
 -- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops --
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Mime
View raw message