Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 12545 invoked from network); 28 Nov 2004 23:52:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Nov 2004 23:52:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 73449 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2004 23:52:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73423 invoked by uid 500); 28 Nov 2004 23:52:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 73409 invoked by uid 99); 28 Nov 2004 23:52:29 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of rich@annexia.org designates 212.56.101.183 as permitted sender) Received: from annexia.force9.co.uk (HELO annexia.force9.co.uk) (212.56.101.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:52:27 -0800 Received: from rich by annexia.force9.co.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYYq8-00008o-00 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:52:24 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 23:52:24 +0000 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: PCRE in 2.1/2.2 Message-ID: <20041128235224.GA501@annexia.org> References: <419B99C1.1030102@force-elite.com> <20041117192402.GA797@redhat.com> <20041117210538.20719c19@parker> <41A6722E.9090809@apache.org> <20041127192800.GA12427@annexia.org> <41A8E803.1010900@apache.org> <41AA6103.6020102@apache.org> <4CB053E3B50DC511EDCA60F4@[10.0.1.11]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CB053E3B50DC511EDCA60F4@[10.0.1.11]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i From: Richard Jones X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 03:39:33PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Sunday, November 28, 2004 3:36 PM -0800 Brian Pane =20 > wrote: >=20 > >Meanwhile, now that we have the latest release of PCRE in httpd-2.1, one > >option would help somewhat would be to backport it into httpd-2.0. >=20 > I doubt we'd be able to maintain binary compatibility if we did that. So= ,=20 > I'd strongly urge that we don't touch PCRE in 2.0.x. -- justin Is this (binary compatibility) really a policy? The problem right now is that people are asking to run my software on Apache 2, and I cannot offer that because my software links with the system PCRE via an external library dependency. Rich. --=20 Richard Jones. http://www.annexia.org/ http://www.j-london.com/ >>> http://www.team-notepad.com/ - collaboration tools for teams <<< Merjis Ltd. http://www.merjis.com/ - improving website return on investment http://winwinsales.co.uk/ - CRM consultancy --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBqmS44le1M6q9pzoRAjc7AJ93L5HZU2c3lYrKNha1cCdHXqqrggCg7oB0 pbV8gArweJMD9COwM9D6rG0= =amXX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RnlQjJ0d97Da+TV1--