Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of jorton@redhat.com designates
 66.187.233.31 as permitted sender)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:13:50 +0000
From: Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com>
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: PCRE in 2.1/2.2
Message-ID: <20041117201350.GA1378@redhat.com>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
References: <419B99C1.1030102@force-elite.com>
 <20041117192402.GA797@redhat.com> <20041117210538.20719c19@parker>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20041117210538.20719c19@parker>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:05:38PM +0100, André Malo wrote:
> But we should take the effort and try to keep up to date. Current PCRE version
> is 5.0 with many many bugfixes and optimizations since 3.9, which we're using.
> 
> I've tried to update the stuff from time to time, but my autofoo knowledge
> seems to be too limited yet. I'd really appreciate if someone would work on
> such a task :)

Yeah I've also tried and ended up thinking "hmm this should really be
using a vendor branch" and then my head explodes... so maybe once the
CVS->SVN conversion it'll be easier and I'll have another go :).  I did
notice the local SMALL_NMATCH changes have been merged upstream though
which is nice.

joe