httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Brad Nicholes" <BNICHO...@novell.com>
Subject Fwd: Re: [PROPOSAL-VOTE] Adopt lazy consensus for backports...
Date Wed, 17 Nov 2004 01:22:25 GMT
moving to dev@ list

>>> Ian.Holsman@cnet.com Tuesday, November 16, 2004 6:00:16 PM >>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

+1 it might open up a couple of bugs/regressions, but it will certainly

mean more fixes going in

On 17/11/2004, at 10:08 AM, Brad Nicholes wrote:

>    During ApacheCon several httpd PMC members got together to
discuss
> current issues with the httpd project and to try to find better ways
to
> manage the project.  One of the issues that was discussed heavily
was
> the current policy of RTC vs CTR.  The feeling of some of the PMC
> members is that the RTC policy as it is currently implemented on the

> 2.0
> branch, is causing unnecessary overhead which has resulted in the
> slowdown of activity in the httpd project.  One proposal that was
made
> would be to adopt a lazy consensus rule.  Basically what this means
is
> that when a backport is proposed in the STATUS file, after a period
of
> time and if the proposal has not recieved any 0 or -1 votes, it
would
> automatically be approved for backport by lazy consensus.  The
purpose
> for this proposal is to avoid stagnation of backport proposals in
the
> STATUS file simply due to the lack of votes.
>
>
> Brad
>
- --
Ian Holsman
Director
Network Management Systems
CNET Networks
PH: 415-344-2608 (USA) /(++61) 3-9818-0132 (Australia)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFBmqKgq3pgvCz4ZCcRAk6aAJ4pjGy170JuvPoq8fWgWtsf3Qw+kQCfXSe+
RmXGGKTaFWWTH6UeO/IQVZU=
=k5e/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Mime
View raw message