httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL-VOTE] Adopt lazy consensus for backports...
Date Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:27:51 GMT
Let's look at it this way. 2.1 is CTR whereas 2.0
is RTC. This applies to backports. However,
the Review for most backports is "already
done" within the 2.1 CTR cycle. If the original
has been in 2.1 for a "significant" amount of
time, it implies review. So the required review
for that backport in 2.0 is pretty much mostly
done. In other words, the R for 2.0 backports
assumes that the CTR process in 2.1 is actually
being done.

This, I feel, should allow for some measurable leniency
regarding backports in 2.0.

View raw message