httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From André Malo ...@perlig.de>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/docs/manual new_features_2_2.html new_features_2_2.html.en new_features_2_2.xml new_features_2_2.xml.meta
Date Sun, 07 Nov 2004 22:49:37 GMT
* "Justin Erenkrantz" <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:

> > * pquerna@apache.org wrote:
> >
> >> pquerna     2004/11/06 22:01:50
> >>
> >>   Added:       docs/manual new_features_2_2.html
> >> new_features_2_2.html.en
> >>                         new_features_2_2.xml new_features_2_2.xml.meta
> >>   Log:
> >>   First Swing at a 2.0 -> 2.2 New Features Document.
> >
> > As long as we just have 2.1, wouldn't it be better to have a
> > new_features_2_1
> > document? We use the 2.1 version number all over the docs.
> > (and I don't see 2.2 tomorrow ;)
> 
> IMHO, no.  2.1 will never be a 'public' release by our versioning
> definition.  Only 2.2 will be something that we'd recommend to the general
> public.  2.1 could only be at best beta.  -- justin

Well, but it's still the 2.1 branch with 2.1 docs (docs-2.1/). And, of course,
once tagged and released (as alpha, beta, whatever) it *is* public. Though not
stable. That's a difference :)

nd
-- 
>>> Muschelflucht-Zusatzeinrichtung.
>> Shell-Escape ist ja noch klar, aber `Zusatzeinrichtung'?
> extension?
Feature.                          -- gefunden in de.org.ccc

Mime
View raw message