Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44134 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2004 18:08:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2004 18:08:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 76239 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2004 18:07:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 76167 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2004 18:07:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 76151 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2004 18:07:50 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [167.206.5.78] (HELO mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net) (167.206.5.78) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 11:07:50 -0700 Received: from dosa.chappati.org (ool-44c1e27a.dyn.optonline.net [68.193.226.122]) by mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I5A009ZQ2C31R@mta5.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for dev@httpd.apache.org; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by dosa.chappati.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 04281266571; Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:07:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:07:14 -0400 From: Manoj Kasichainula Subject: Re: Bye bye welcome page In-reply-to: To: dev@httpd.apache.org Mail-followup-to: dev@httpd.apache.org Message-id: <20041008180714.GK19646@dosa.chappati.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i References: <4162DD61.6070001@sharp.fm> <4162E251.3070802@sharp.fm> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:12:33PM -0400, Joshua Slive wrote: >My opinion is that the shorter message is better because, by the fact >that it gives no information at all, it is less likely to be >misinterpreted to mean something that the website owner doesn't intend. +1, as long as there's no mention of Apache anywhere on the page