Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11962 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 19:27:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 19:27:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 70834 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2004 19:27:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70735 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2004 19:27:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 70717 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2004 19:27:28 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.160.171.50] (HELO jupiter.hal-nine-zero-zero-zero.net) (217.160.171.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 12:27:24 -0700 Received: (qmail 16770 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2004 19:27:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO news.perlig.de) (80.131.152.30) by jupiter.hal-nine-zero-zero-zero.net with SMTP; 8 Sep 2004 19:27:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 21:27:20 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Time for 1.3.32 ? Message-Id: <20040908212720.3832c876@parker> In-Reply-To: References: <20040907202636.6b665ce9@parker> <20040908120557.00000dd5@fe-pc-092.int.cinetic.de> Organization: TIMTOWTDI X-Mailer: Yes! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N * Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-15] Andr=E9 Malo wrote: > > Actually I'm talking about the two proposals on the top. If you are > > interested in backport voting, you need to touch the STATUS file anyway > > and should follow the commits there. >=20 > I'd still suggest posting them here. In case you've overseen it, my reply contained the stuff, including referen= ces to the patches... But posting all backport proposals here doesn't sound like a good idea to m= e, the STATUS file(s) is (are) for that purpose. > Until the lawyers here finish > chewing on the ASF CLA stuff I have no CVS access, so I can't actually > look at this stuff. *shrug*, nd --=20 Winnetous Erbe: