Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98512 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2004 17:01:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Sep 2004 17:01:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 31901 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 17:00:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31758 invoked by uid 500); 7 Sep 2004 17:00:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31592 invoked by uid 99); 7 Sep 2004 17:00:54 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.133.192.6] (HELO devsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.192.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Sep 2004 10:00:53 -0700 Received: (from jim@localhost) by devsys.jaguNET.com (8.11.7a/jag-2.6) id i87H0mO03179 for dev@httpd.apache.org; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:00:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Jagielski Message-Id: <200409071700.i87H0mO03179@devsys.jaguNET.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow mod_cache to be build/loaded as DSO To: dev@httpd.apache.org Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Reply-To: jim@jaguNET.com In-Reply-To: <20040907150113.GA18276@redhat.com> from "Joe Orton" at Sep 07, 2004 04:01:13 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N True, but this is one that I'm hitting a lot, especially with the increase in cache development going on... And this is the only bundled module that I've hit this on when httpd is build "normally". Joe Orton wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:03:39AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > If you add libgcc.a into any DSO, wouldn't that take care of the > > > issue? (does the SH_LIBS variable allow you to specify extra > > > libraries that should be linked into DSOs?) > > > > I'm thinking specifically about preventing the dependency on libgcc. > > Important for those who bundle/redistribute httpd :) > > You can't second guess when you'll introduce a dependency on libgcc > especially with all the 64-bit arithmetic using apr_time_t. Build GCC > without a shared libgcc and you can be sure to avoid any extra run-time > dependency, of course. > > joe > -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson