Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93189 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 16:54:21 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 16:54:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 15349 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2004 16:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15313 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2004 16:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15299 invoked by uid 99); 3 Sep 2004 16:54:13 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [216.255.199.145] (HELO utopia.in.force-elite.com) (216.255.199.145) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:54:12 -0700 X-AuthUser: chip@force-elite.com Received: from [10.10.10.101] (199.5.172.2:45076) by utopia.in.force-elite.com with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id for from ; Fri, 03 Sep 2004 09:54:08 -0700 Subject: Re: Removing the Experimental MPMs in 2.2? From: Paul Querna To: weigelt@metux.de Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20040903164701.GA7671@nibiru.metux.de> References: <1094181924.27956.12.camel@localhost> <200409031411.24846.mailinglists@xgm.de> <20040903164701.GA7671@nibiru.metux.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 10:56:57 -0600 Message-Id: <1094230617.29415.16.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.92.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 18:47 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Florian Lindner wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Maybe replacing perchild with metuxmpm would be a good idea? metuxmpm does > > basically the same, but in fact it works. > > ACK. > We'd be glad to get it in the official tree. Have a patch against 2.1/cvs that I can review?