httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>
Subject Re: Bug #31228
Date Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:47:02 GMT


Garrett Rooney wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
>> --On Friday, September 17, 2004 1:07 PM -0400 Garrett Rooney
>> <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Could someone please take a look at bug 31228 in bugzilla?
>>>
>>> It's just adding a new response code (226) which is defined in rfc3229.
>>>
>>> I'm working on a module that implements a type of rfc3229 delta
>>> encoding,
>>> and it'd be nice if people didn't have to apply a patch to Apache in
>>> order
>>> to use it.
>>
>>
>>
>> FWIW, I looked at it the other night and I'm mildly iffy on adding it.
> 
> 
> Any particular reason?  It seems like providing support for the response
> code specified in the RFC would only help encourage people to actually
> implement support for it in Apache, which seems like a good thing to me...

provided that garrett's patch is technically the correct way to add a new
status code to apache, and that RFC3229 went through the proper motions to
capture exclusive use of 226 within http, I don't see any reason why 226
shouldn't be added in 2.1.

--Geoff

Mime
View raw message