Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96855 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 22:32:34 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 22:32:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 76731 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2004 22:32:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 76711 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2004 22:32:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 76697 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2004 22:32:25 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [80.229.52.226] (HELO hugin.webthing.com) (80.229.52.226) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 15:32:22 -0700 Received: by hugin.webthing.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id D6D7D27F25; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:32:19 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugin.webthing.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA02927489 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:32:19 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:32:19 +0100 (BST) From: Nick Kew To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Proxy Load Balancer In-Reply-To: <41227D7A.2050105@sharp.fm> Message-ID: References: <41227D7A.2050105@sharp.fm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Graham Leggett wrote: > > (1) The proxy balancer directives are implemented in mod_proxy.c, > > not proxy_balancer.c. Was this necessary? > > proxy_balancer should in theory provide the algorithm to do the > balancing, while the generic directives to specify the members of the > cluster could be generically specified. Indeed. But not all of us have a cluster or want clustering code. > > (2) ISTR some discussion of generic connection pooling, but I don't > > see it in the code. Am I missing something, or is this still TBD? > > The connection pool is there, it's implemented using apr_reslist. /me kicks himself for not looking inside proxy_util.c :-( Thanks. -- Nick Kew