Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30318 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 16:24:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 16:24:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 92213 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2004 16:24:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92067 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2004 16:24:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 92054 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2004 16:24:38 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [207.155.252.12] (HELO sheffield.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:24:36 -0700 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.client.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id MAA24088; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:24:34 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040817110648.05ff4900@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: wrowe%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:08:56 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Where is the AJP code... In-Reply-To: <4121AC2E.2050101@fujitsu-siemens.com> References: <6.1.2.0.2.20040816180225.05c5ab40@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <4121AC2E.2050101@fujitsu-siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 01:56 AM 8/17/2004, jean-frederic clere wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>At 03:58 PM 8/16/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote: >> >>> The addition of the proxy_ajp module to the httpd project presents a >>>build problem. The AJP module code exists in httpd/modules/proxy in the >>>httpd project but the AJP lib code still sits in the >>>jakarta-tomcat-connectors\ajp\ajplib\test in the jakarta project. Is >>>the AJPLIB code going to be migrated to the httpd project? Why is the >>>AJPLIB code in a test directory? >> >>I'm +1 for placing it in modules/proxy/ ... iff it will be maintained >>and kept up to date. > >+1 Then let's go ahead, would you please commit the current flavor of the ajp sources to modules/proxy/ (not modules/proxy/ajp/) with a commit message to their official source location within jakarta-tomcat-connectors/ (the real location, not the temporary ajp/test/ajplib). Just in case another maintainer wants to look aside at their development. Then just a few tweaks so we don't delve the ./ajp/ directory. Bill