Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 94329 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 23:16:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 23:16:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 47948 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2004 23:16:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47835 invoked by uid 500); 16 Aug 2004 23:16:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 47791 invoked by uid 99); 16 Aug 2004 23:16:19 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [207.155.252.97] (HELO elephant.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.97) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:16:17 -0700 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.client.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by elephant.cnchost.com id TAA13648; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 19:16:15 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040816180225.05c5ab40@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: wrowe%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 18:03:44 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Where is the AJP code... Cc: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 03:58 PM 8/16/2004, Brad Nicholes wrote: > The addition of the proxy_ajp module to the httpd project presents a >build problem. The AJP module code exists in httpd/modules/proxy in the >httpd project but the AJP lib code still sits in the >jakarta-tomcat-connectors\ajp\ajplib\test in the jakarta project. Is >the AJPLIB code going to be migrated to the httpd project? Why is the >AJPLIB code in a test directory? I'm +1 for placing it in modules/proxy/ ... iff it will be maintained and kept up to date. If not, assuming that lib location is wrong - it should become an autoconf option. Can we trust that ajp lib c sources will be kept in sync? Bill