Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 61559 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2004 02:46:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2004 02:46:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 33960 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2004 02:46:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 33928 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2004 02:46:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 33910 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2004 02:46:05 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [203.205.110.81] (HELO apm01.ocv.ne.jp) (203.205.110.81) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:46:03 -0700 Received: from mailhost.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa (md2u158203.ocv.ne.jp [203.205.158.203]) by apm01.ocv.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2B122C038 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:45:59 +0900 (JST) Received: from mailhost.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i732jujl000668 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:45:56 +0900 (JST) Received: (from sasamoto@localhost) by mailhost.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/Submit) id i732jpuD000667 for dev%httpd.apache.org@apm01.ocv.ne.jp; Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:45:51 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:45:51 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200408030245.i732jpuD000667@mailhost.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa> From: Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re^4: [patch] perchild.c In-Reply-To: References: <200407202033.i6KKXIEE016432@mailhost.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa> <200408020313.i723DUBe029429@mailhost.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >attached patch looks a bit simpler; does it look okay to you? Yes, it looks good and smart. # I wonder about intention of the original code `if (!body)`; # in what case could it occur... recvmsg() could fail? # If so, rather return value of the recvmsg() should be checked... Tsuyoshi SASAMOTO nazonazo@super.win.ne.jp