httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [AJP] proxy status
Date Thu, 12 Aug 2004 17:04:22 GMT
At 11:19 AM 8/12/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>--On Thursday, August 12, 2004 12:57 AM -0500 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
wrote:
>
>>Although he's subscribed to all three lists, I'd ask that they go either
>>to dev@httpd or proxy-dev@httpd.  The history of the discussions is just
>>as important as the actual code commits.
>
>Can we please not use proxy-dev@httpd?  As long as the code resides in the main httpd
repository, development discussion belongs on dev@httpd, IMHO.  

That seems rational to me.  The reason for proposing proxy-dev@httpd
is so that tomcat-dev'ers wouldn't have to swallow the full bandwidth of
dev@httpd (converse of the problem where they asked anyone in dev@httpd
to follow tomcat-dev@jakarta for the duration of that proxy_ajp development).

So I ask our tomcat-dev'ers who are interested in proxy_ajp, proxy_balancer
and so on - are you already subscribed/following dev@httpd?  Or do you feel
a -strong- need for a lower-traffic list?  If no one complains loudly, we will keep
all proxy traffic on dev@httpd (cc's to tomcat-dev if you feel a point needs
feedback from the tomcat connector folks.)

Bill



Mime
View raw message