Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 41800 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2004 03:13:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Jul 2004 03:13:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 64571 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2004 03:13:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64350 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jul 2004 03:13:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 64337 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jul 2004 03:13:52 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [207.155.252.7] (HELO illustrious.cnchost.com) (207.155.252.7) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 20:13:51 -0700 Received: from rcsv650.rowe-clan.net (c-24-13-128-132.client.comcast.net [24.13.128.132]) by illustrious.cnchost.com id XAA18125; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 23:13:49 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.17] Errors-To: Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040715214708.03111ae8@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: wrowe%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 21:50:24 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: Move apache-1.3 to Subversion In-Reply-To: <878yezh212.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> References: <200405241852.i4OIq9P21751@devsys.jaguNET.com> <1086559573.2454.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> <40C3E441.4020805@modperlcookbook.org> <0BE454CC-B83A-11D8-ADE0-000393B4C1D8@red-bean.com> <40C4716F.8090007@wstoddard.com> <878yezh212.fsf@gemini.sunstarsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I agree, here, with Joe. Wondering if it's an appropriate alternative. I'm facing similar, with a subproject entering incubation, and I'd like to know our decision here, before I go and create a subproject structure under /httpd/ that turns out to be wonky. is /trunk/httpd/ an appropriate solution? This bit me, trying to check out some /incubation/ stuff. Bill At 09:32 AM 6/7/2004, Joe Schaefer wrote: >Bill Stoddard writes: > >> Brian W. Fitzpatrick wrote: >> > On Jun 6, 2004, at 10:42 PM, Geoffrey Young wrote: >> > >> >> >> >>> FYI, Fitz did a conversion of apache-1.3, which is now located at >> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/. (in the test repository). >> >> >> >> >> >> wow, that's a lot of data - 10 minutes later and I'm still downloading... >> > Wait! No! You don't want to check out >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/ ... you want to check out >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/trunk/ >> > By checking out http://svn.apache.org/repos/test/httpd/, you're >> > getting one copy of the httpd source tree for every branch and tag! >> >That's a LOT of data! >> >> This is going to be a recurring problem. Geoff did the intuitive >> thing, which turned out to be wrong. Not good. > >I think the other repository layout, with eg /trunk/httpd instead of >/httpd/trunk, prevents this problem since the intuitive thing >would yield a 404. > > >-- >Joe Schaefer