Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3059 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 15:29:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 15:29:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 12410 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2004 15:12:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12268 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2004 15:12:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 12203 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2004 15:12:08 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [209.133.199.10] (HELO jimsys.jaguNET.com) (209.133.199.10) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jul 2004 08:12:06 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jimsys.jaguNET.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB092B9591 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:06:53 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) In-Reply-To: References: <200407031324.i63DO4608162@devsys.jaguNET.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <59500660-CF4D-11D8-BB1B-000393D76AB8@jaguNET.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jim Jagielski Subject: Re: Time for 1.3.32 ? Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 09:06:52 -0400 To: dev@httpd.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yes, we do, and we're still waiting for a patch. However, I can't see us delaying 1.3.32 for an "unreasonable" amount of time. On Jul 5, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote: > We still have that outstanding issue of conn->keepalive being bogus in > ap_die() because it hasn't been set yet and thus we can't discard the > request body in situations where we really need to. See my previous > long > explanation of that problem. > > -Rasmus > > On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Let's use STATUS :) >> >> =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo wrote: >>> >>> * Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> >>>> well, if you're going to be that way then consider my simple Win32 >>>> patch to >>>> fix reporting of proper error by spawnl(), which needs another +1 :) >>>> >>>> (see thread "[1.3 PATCH] restore failing errno for Win32 spawn >>>> errors" on >>>> this list) >>> >>> +1 from me for that errno patch ;) >>> >>> nd >>> -- >>> "Umfassendes Werk (auch fuer Umsteiger vom Apache 1.3)" >>> -- aus einer Rezension >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> ====================================================================== >> ===== >> Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] >> http://www.jaguNET.com/ >> "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order >> will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson >> > >