Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37217 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2004 10:57:25 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2004 10:57:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 24100 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2004 10:57:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 24034 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2004 10:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 24020 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2004 10:57:17 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [66.18.69.32] (HELO mail02.infosat.net) (66.18.69.32) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 03:57:17 -0700 Received: from [66.18.80.117] (HELO sharp.fm) by mail02.infosat.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 93117946; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:57:08 +0200 Message-ID: <40FE4C03.5080202@sharp.fm> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:57:07 +0200 From: Graham Leggett User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tomcat Developers List CC: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: Invitation to HTTPD commiters in tomcat-dev References: <20040721080018.905F349DC9@dns1.vodatel.hr> <40FE44D3.5060500@sharp.fm> <40FE46ED.3010507@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <40FE46ED.3010507@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Henri Gomez wrote: > BTW, could we expect to be able to use in proxy_ajp URL like > ajp://VIRTUALNAME, where VIRTUALNAME could be the name of an > AJP cluster backend ? That would be up to proxy_ajp to decide, so yes. What happens is that when the config says ProxyPass /myApp ajp://VIRTUALNAME and the user requests the URL /myApp/index.jsp, proxy will give proxy_ajp an URL that looks like this: ajp://VIRTUALNAME/index.jsp It's up to proxy_ajp to understand what that means. > Also could we expect the handling of failure via mod_proxy + proxy_xxx , > ie: when a tomcat respond 503 or 400, to be able to switch to another > tomcat in the cluster. It's a mandatory feature for now. Proxy already loops around and tries again on connection failure to a different server in the backend. If proxy cannot handle a 503 or a 400, then it can be made to handle it - again it's a feature that would be really useful regardless of the protocol. Regards, Graham --