httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Time for 1.3.32 ?
Date Tue, 06 Jul 2004 13:06:52 GMT
Yes, we do, and we're still waiting for a patch. However,
I can't see us delaying 1.3.32 for an "unreasonable"
amount of time.

On Jul 5, 2004, at 10:54 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:

> We still have that outstanding issue of conn->keepalive being bogus in
> ap_die() because it hasn't been set yet and thus we can't discard the
> request body in situations where we really need to.  See my previous  
> long
> explanation of that problem.
>
> -Rasmus
>
> On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Let's use STATUS :)
>>
>> =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andr=E9?= Malo wrote:
>>>
>>> * Jeff Trawick <trawick@attglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> well, if you're going to be that way then consider my simple Win32  
>>>> patch to
>>>> fix reporting of proper error by spawnl(), which needs another +1 :)
>>>>
>>>> (see thread "[1.3 PATCH] restore failing errno for Win32 spawn  
>>>> errors" on
>>>> this list)
>>>
>>> +1 from me for that errno patch ;)
>>>
>>> nd
>>> --
>>> "Umfassendes Werk (auch fuer Umsteiger vom Apache 1.3)"
>>>                                           -- aus einer Rezension
>>>
>>> <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ====================================================================== 
>> =====
>>    Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]    
>> http://www.jaguNET.com/
>>       "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
>>              will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
>>
>
>


Mime
View raw message