Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 69226 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2004 03:29:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 2004 03:29:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 38446 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2004 03:29:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38387 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2004 03:29:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 38361 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2004 03:29:27 -0000 Received: from [80.91.224.249] (HELO main.gmane.org) (80.91.224.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.27.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 20:29:27 -0700 Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BViuZ-0001Ox-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 05:28:59 +0200 Received: from c-24-13-33-153.client.comcast.net ([24.13.33.153]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 05:28:59 +0200 Received: from eddie by c-24-13-33-153.client.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 05:28:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: Edward Rudd Subject: Re: Rebuilding modules.apache.org Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 22:28:56 -0500 Organization: Me Organized? Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <1086226291.30306.24.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-13-33-153.client.comcast.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) Sender: news X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Thu, 03 Jun 2004 04:36:07 +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote: > >> We are looking for feedback on our plans. What do you want to see on a >> new modules website? What features are important to you? What hurdles >> do you see to a successfully replacement? What other audiences should >> we try to address? > I would like to see an URL validator so that the entered URLs are at least first checked before stored. > Also a weekly automatic check that the URL is still accessable would be fine; if the check fails more than 3 times then switch the module to 'invisible' so that the users dont get the nasty outdated links all the time... > I agree and I made sure that is in the design doc.. http://svn.outoforder.cc/svn/mod_modules/trunk/docs/design.xml > Guenter.