Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Errors-To: <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.2.20040613104509.044ec280@pop3.rowe-clan.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 10:47:13 -0500
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 STATUS
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <20040612104335.GA29239@redhat.com>
References: <20040612095456.57792.qmail@minotaur.apache.org>
 <20040612104335.GA29239@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 05:43 AM 6/12/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 09:54:56AM -0000, nd@apache.org wrote:
>>   --- STATUS  11 Jun 2004 21:05:21 -0000      1.751.2.920
>>   +++ STATUS  12 Jun 2004 09:54:56 -0000      1.751.2.921
>>   @@ -74,8 +74,10 @@
>>    
>>        *) mod_ssl: Remove some unused functions (after CAN-2004-0488 fix is applied)
>>           http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/httpd-2.0/modules/ssl/ssl_util.c?r1=1.46&r2=1.47
>>   -       +1: jorton, nd
>>   +       +1: jorton
>>           trawick: need changes to mod_ssl.h to remove prototypes for those removed functions
>>   +       -1: nd: actually that's a public API change (major bump) then and not
>>   +           applicable for 2.0, just let 'em in
>
>The entire contents of mod_ssl.h just cannot be considered a public API,
>that's too much, even the config structures are in there.  The only
>thing that's usable from other modules is the optional hook, and in
>reality that declaration just gets cut'n'pasted anyway (even by
>third-party modules I've seen).

Although I'm totally in agreement that these should never have become
public, the fact is they are.

It's a good effort but not worth any investment in 2.0.x, with 2.2 (2.1-dev)
these finally go 'into hiding' as they should have been in the first place.

Bill