httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>
Subject Re: Dumping Loaded Modules
Date Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:34:00 GMT


Paul Querna wrote:
> Attached is patch add a new command line option to httpd:
> '-t -D DUMP_MODULES'
> 
> This will print a list of all loaded shared modules and all statically
> compiled modules.
> 
> My only question is, what should the command be called?
> 
> '-t -D DUMP_MODULES' vs '-M' vs some other argument.
> 
> I based DUMP_MODULES on the existing DUMP_VHOSTS command, but I am not
> sure if the DUMP_VHOSTS is supposed to be a standard or not?

yeah, I guess that's the question.  I just did something somewhat similar,
but ended up using a new -option instead.

  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=108693011011443&w=2

there probably ought to be one way of doing this kind of diagnostic thing
and we all should follow suit (whatever it ends up being).

> Index: modules/mappers/mod_so.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvspublic/httpd-2.0/modules/mappers/mod_so.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> diff -u -r1.1 mod_so.h
> --- modules/mappers/mod_so.h	4 Jun 2004 22:40:47 -0000	1.1
> +++ modules/mappers/mod_so.h	20 Jun 2004 01:35:44 -0000
> @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
>  /* optional function declaration */
>  APR_DECLARE_OPTIONAL_FN(module *, ap_find_loaded_module_symbol,
>                          (server_rec *s, const char *modname));
> +APR_DECLARE_OPTIONAL_FN(void, ap_dump_loaded_modules,
> +                        (apr_pool_t* p, server_rec *s));

out of curiosity, what is the advantage to using the optional function here?
 I am only familiar with it in the mod_include sense, so perhaps I should be
looking into something like this instead?

--Geoff

Mime
View raw message