Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24333 invoked from network); 22 May 2004 16:32:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 May 2004 16:32:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 82499 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2004 16:32:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82403 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2004 16:32:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 82315 invoked by uid 98); 22 May 2004 16:32:15 -0000 Received: from striker@apache.org by hermes.apache.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.70. Clear:RC:0(213.84.19.217):. Processed in 0.037273 secs); 22 May 2004 16:32:15 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: striker@apache.org via hermes.apache.org X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.20 (Clear:RC:0(213.84.19.217):. Processed in 0.037273 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (213.84.19.217) by hermes.apache.org with SMTP; 22 May 2004 16:32:14 -0000 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id 811F51C4121; Sat, 22 May 2004 18:32:08 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Compile problems - 2.0.50-dev From: Sander Striker To: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <40AF7691.5050904@sharp.fm> References: <40AE9DEB.8020802@sharp.fm> <6.1.0.6.2.20040522000515.02b5eec0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> <40AF7691.5050904@sharp.fm> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1085243527.2001.1897.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 18:32:08 +0200 X-Spam-Rating: hermes.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:49, Graham Leggett wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > >>I have just tried to build a test tree of the most recent v2.0.50-dev, and it broke like this: > >> > >>config.c:1587: `FNM_PERIOD' undeclared (first use in this function) > > > > > > Attempting to build against APR 1.0? > > The httpd tree was whatever was the latest v2.0 CVS, and the > apr/apr-util was the latest in CVS. What tag should I have been used for > apr? AP[RUI]_0_9. Sander