Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 84690 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 11:24:22 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2004 11:24:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 139 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2004 11:24:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99831 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2004 11:24:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 99816 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2004 11:24:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) (24.25.9.103) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 12 Apr 2004 11:24:14 -0000 Received: from attglobal.net (rdu57-70-140.nc.rr.com [66.57.70.140]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i3CBOCC8009804 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:24:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <407A7C17.7090702@attglobal.net> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 07:23:03 -0400 From: Jeff Trawick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS i86pc; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040117 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: mod_cgi and apr_setup_signal_thread Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >Question: Can we enable SIGALRM without breaking any other functionality? I would think that apr_proc_create() could be responsible for establishing a sane signal handling environment for the new child process w.r.t. asynchronous signals such as SIGALRM. What MPMs are you using? worker MPM for both tests? prefork MPM for the mod_cgi test and worker MPM for the mod_cgid test?