Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87190 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 17:19:57 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 17:19:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 90591 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2004 17:19:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 90546 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2004 17:19:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 90531 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2004 17:19:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zcamail05.zca.compaq.com) (161.114.32.105) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Mar 2004 17:19:43 -0000 Received: from cacexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net (cacexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.92.1.50]) by zcamail05.zca.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62216E1C7 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:19:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from cacexc03.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.92.1.27]) by cacexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:19:45 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: mod_ssl TLS/SSL upgrade... Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 09:19:45 -0800 Message-ID: <16A24B6050584143978000646801E93557BF43@cacexc03.americas.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: mod_ssl TLS/SSL upgrade... Thread-Index: AcQC0ypBjfPgYq0DRaWNCu3ka1m9BgAAKIDA From: "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2004 17:19:46.0043 (UTC) FILETIME=[0E5CB4B0:01C402D6] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N >-----Original Message----- >From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:justin@erenkrantz.com] [SNIP] >--On Friday, March 5, 2004 12:20 AM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr."=20 > wrote: > >> But I have a better proposal - let us simply move back the=20 >entire mod_ssl 2.1 >> back to 2.0. Only binary compat issues would need review. =20 >But too many >> good things have happened on 2.1 to this specific component. > >I'd rather just start the 2.2 release cycle than do that. -- justin I think a lot of good things have gone into the mod_ssl 2.1 - if we = start with 2.2, we may still have to back-port the majority of fixes to = 2.0 (as customers may not jump immediately to 2.2). -Madhu