httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Geoff Thorpe <ge...@geoffthorpe.net>
Subject Re: [STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Mar 24 23:45:11 EST 2004
Date Thu, 25 Mar 2004 18:03:36 GMT
On March 25, 2004 12:46 pm, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
> Now that we're discussing about shmcb, I had another question - I see
> the following in shmcb.c
>
>    608      /* Work on the basis that you need 10 bytes index for each
> session 609       * (approx 150 bytes), which is to divide temp by 160
> - and then 610       * make sure we err on having too index space to
> burn even when 611       * the cache is full, which is a lot less
> stupid than having 612       * having not enough index space to utilise
> the whole cache!. */ 613      temp /= 120;
>
>
> Is the comment on line 609 wrong OR is line 613 wrong ?

Neither. Line 610 is the reason, even if I wasn't able to rite my english 
proper like at a time the riting did. :-)

Cheers,
Geoff

-- 
Geoff Thorpe
geoff@geoffthorpe.net
http://www.geoffthorpe.net/


Mime
View raw message