httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From The Doctor <doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca>
Subject Re: 2.0.49 (rc2) tarballs available
Date Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:25:31 GMT
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:39:46PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 16:16, The Doctor wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 04:07:27PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2004-03-14 at 15:22, The Doctor wrote:
> > > > Failure again on BSD/OS 5.1
> > > 
> > > Yeah, I wasn't expecting that to go away, since there weren't any
> > > BSD fixes to this effect.  Jeff asked you something in response
> > > to your failures with rc1:
> > > 
> > > """
> > > What got installed into /usr/libexec/apache by make install?  Did the
> > > DSOs get 
> > > installed with unexpected names?
> > > 
> > > Second, does 2.0.48 built in exactly the same way fail in a similar
> > > manner?
> > > """
> > > 
> > > Could you please provide us with an answer to that so we can try
> > > and locate the cause of the problem?
> > >
> > 
> > This works on BSD/Os 4.3 but screws up on 5.1 .
> > 
> > I have  a ticket with Wind river on this.  they suspect the libtool
> > but I would liketo come on baord the BSD/OS 5.1 Box and inspect this
> > problem for yourselves.
> 
> Could you try running 'buildconf' from the top of the tree and see
> if you get the same problem after that?
> 
> Sander

Tell me how and I will do it.

-- 
Member - Liberal International	On 11 Sept 2001 the WORLD was violated.
This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca	Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca
Society MUST be saved! Extremists must dissolve.  
Time to see the eternal relegation of Man U, Liverpool, Everton and Millwall

Mime
View raw message