Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95243 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 19:51:55 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 19:51:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 17518 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2004 19:51:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17451 invoked by uid 500); 18 Feb 2004 19:51:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 17370 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 19:51:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prv-mail20.provo.novell.com) (137.65.81.122) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 19:51:29 -0000 Received: from INET-PRV-MTA by prv-mail20.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:51:34 -0700 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.2 Beta Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:51:23 -0700 From: "Brad Nicholes" To: Cc: Subject: Time for 2.0.49, WAS: Re: Time for 1.3.30?? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N +1 Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com >>> striker@apache.org Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:34:44 AM >>> On Wed, 2004-02-18 at 15:28, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I'd like to float the idea of releasing 1.3.30 "soonish". > Not only are there enough changes to warrant a release, but > also to coincide with the changeover to AL 2.0. In response to this, how do we feel about doing 2.0.49 aswell? Sander