Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v612)
In-Reply-To: <30C025BBA30D3343935890628BCCEA321687CA@BOSEXVS2.digitas.com>
References: <30C025BBA30D3343935890628BCCEA321687CA@BOSEXVS2.digitas.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <E37EB56D-624D-11D8-BA59-000393D76AB8@jaguNET.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jaguNET.com>
Subject: Re: Time for 2.0.49, WAS: Re: Time for 1.3.30??
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:06:07 -0500
To: dev@httpd.apache.org

Manni,

What I did was take the latest/working 2.0.x patch (from the PR
report), and backported it to 1.3. I didn't patch the 2.x
trees at the same time, because I simply forgot. :/

I believe Cliff is doing that as we speak.

On Feb 18, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Manni Wood wrote:

> Ummm... as the person who created the new bug (by successfully stomping
> a years-old one in the same module), I have a particular interest in 
> the
> solution of this bug. I had submitted a patch to the 2.x series on
> bugzilla, and, eventually, things died down with no direction, so I
> waited for feedback. So is Jim's patch already ported to 2.x? Is there
> another forum where this got resolved? Also, in future, should I take
> more initiative and submit a complete trio of patches instead of 
> waiting
> for feedback? Helping out is rewarding, but sometimes confusing for
> newbies like me.
>
> Regardless, thanks, all, for helping fix this bug.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Manni
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:jwoolley@virginia.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:33 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Time for 2.0.49, WAS: Re: Time for 1.3.30??
>
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
>
>> In response to this, how do we feel about doing 2.0.49
>> aswell?
>
> +1, but let's make sure to get the mod_usertrack fix finally committed.
> Jim already committed it to 1.3.x as far as I know, and there's no
> reason
> not to commit it to 2.0.x and 2.1.x except I just kept forgetting to do
> so.
>
> --Cliff
>
>
--
=======================================================================
  Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
     "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
            will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson