Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30583 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2004 13:12:54 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2004 13:12:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 70243 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2004 13:12:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69987 invoked by uid 500); 22 Feb 2004 13:12:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 69887 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2004 13:12:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO henry.newn.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.204.130) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Feb 2004 13:12:35 -0000 Received: from quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.204.180]) by henry.newn.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AutPO-00051T-4r; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:12:34 +0000 Received: from prlw1 by quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk with local (Exim 4.20) id 1AutPO-0007T7-1s; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:12:34 +0000 Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 13:12:34 +0000 From: Patrick Welche To: dev@httpd.apache.org Cc: Brad Nicholes , gstein@lyra.org, dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: apr/apr-util python dependence Message-ID: <20040222131234.GA10545@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk> References: <1077407699.1645.8536.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1077407699.1645.8536.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:54:59AM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > On Sat, 2004-02-21 at 23:19, Brad Nicholes wrote: > > I ran the gen-build.py script to try to understand what it is doing. > > I don't see how it would fit into the NetWare build process. The > > NetWare build is completely independant from anything that happens in > > mainstream build process. Just wondering how ubiquitous "mkdep" is and whether that would help? HISTORY The mkdep command appeared in 4.3BSD-Tahoe. (I have a feeling this dependency tracking is an old problem which must have already been solved, but presumably not in an agn-O.S.-tic way..) Cheers, Patrick