httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Manni Wood" <mw...@digitas.com>
Subject RE: Time for 2.0.49, WAS: Re: Time for 1.3.30??
Date Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:33:30 GMT
Ummm... as the person who created the new bug (by successfully stomping
a years-old one in the same module), I have a particular interest in the
solution of this bug. I had submitted a patch to the 2.x series on
bugzilla, and, eventually, things died down with no direction, so I
waited for feedback. So is Jim's patch already ported to 2.x? Is there
another forum where this got resolved? Also, in future, should I take
more initiative and submit a complete trio of patches instead of waiting
for feedback? Helping out is rewarding, but sometimes confusing for
newbies like me.

Regardless, thanks, all, for helping fix this bug.

Cheers,

-Manni

-----Original Message-----
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:jwoolley@virginia.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:33 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 2.0.49, WAS: Re: Time for 1.3.30??

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Sander Striker wrote:

> In response to this, how do we feel about doing 2.0.49
> aswell?

+1, but let's make sure to get the mod_usertrack fix finally committed.
Jim already committed it to 1.3.x as far as I know, and there's no
reason
not to commit it to 2.0.x and 2.1.x except I just kept forgetting to do
so.

--Cliff


Mime
View raw message