From dev-return-40333-apmail-httpd-dev-archive=httpd.apache.org@httpd.apache.org Tue Dec 09 23:48:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79139 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 23:48:54 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 23:48:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 14130 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2003 23:48:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14086 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2003 23:48:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14073 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2003 23:48:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ipssmtp1.xcellenet.com) (63.162.4.4) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 9 Dec 2003 23:48:34 -0000 Received: from ipsspamstop.xcellenet.com (ipsspamstop.xcellenet.com [10.25.9.128]) by ipssmtp1.xcellenet.com (Build 103 8.9.3p2/NT-8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA04319 for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:48:28 -0500 Received: from ipsmailscan.xcellenet.com [10.25.9.125] by ipsspamstop.xcellenet.com [10.25.9.128] (CMSPraetor 5.10.4411) with SMTP id 4F79783552FD48B8B1884A143F1D291D for ; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 18:48:23 -0500 Received: FROM ipsxchg3.xcellenet.com BY ipsmailscan.xcellenet.com ; Tue Dec 09 18:48:22 2003 -0500 Received: by ipsxchg3.xcellenet.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:48:21 -0500 Message-ID: <0F34785D01A8D311AE4100508B5BF50B0454AEF4@ipsxchg5.xcellenet.com> From: "Conti, Chris" To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: RE: Mem Leak when reverse proxying HTTP post requests (slightly o ff-topic) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 18:48:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Any chance you could take a peek at the patch I submitted for bug 19954 (HTTP tunneling through reverse proxy does not always work) as long as you are looking at that source file? BTW when I submitted the patch I bone-headedly swapped the params to diff so the changes show as '-' instead of '+' Chris Conti -----Original Message----- From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:jwoolley@virginia.edu] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:37 PM To: 'dev@httpd.apache.org' Subject: RE: Mem Leak when reverse proxying HTTP post requests On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Larry Toppi wrote: > I found the culprit. The EOS bucket was being removed from the > brigade but not destroyed. I'm going to submit the following patch to fix this bug. > > *** proxy_http_old.c Tue Dec 9 16:19:52 2003 > --- proxy_http.c Tue Dec 9 16:22:14 2003 That looks like a bug to me, yes... though I haven't checked the broader context in detail yet to verify. --Cliff