httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Wilt, Paul" <Paul.W...@il.proquest.com>
Subject RE: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
Date Tue, 09 Dec 2003 21:30:21 GMT
Or even better:

>mod_include: Options +Includes (or IncludesNoExec) wasn't set, removing
include filter.

Paul E Wilt 
Senior Principal Software Engineer
ProQuest Information and Learning
---------------------------------------------------------
http://www.proquest.com  mailto:paul.wilt@il.proquest.com
300 North Zeeb Rd      Phone: (734) 302-6777
Ann Arbor, MI 48106    Fax:   (734) 302-6779
---------------------------------------------------------



-----Original Message-----
From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:06 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES


At 12:37 PM 12/9/2003, Stas Bekman wrote:

>Does this look good?
>
>         ap_log_rerror(APLOG_MARK, APLOG_WARNING, 0, r,
>                       "mod_include: Options +Includes (or
IncludesNoExec) "
>-                      "wasn't set, passing data unmodified");
>+                      "wasn't set, passing data unmodified, removing
myself");
>+        ap_remove_output_filter(f);

Admins have to read this message in their logs, not coders.  What about
this:

>mod_include: Options +Includes (or IncludesNoExec) wasn't set, include
filter removed


Mime
View raw message