httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sander Striker <stri...@apache.org>
Subject Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 CHANGES
Date Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:39:36 GMT
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 12:29, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Greg Stein wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>This is where process gets in the way of just doing the right thing.
> >>Backport it for chrissakes.
> > 
> > 
> > amen.
> 
> The process requires getting 3 +1s.  Anywhere (list, irc, phonecall, STATUS) is 
> okay.

No, recorded +1s are okay, this brings it down to list and STATUS.
Ofcourse to summarize on list that there was support by X and Y on irc
or phone would be ok.

>   I assume what you meant was that you recognize there are 3 +1s for 
> backporting and Stas has no need to update his proposed backport in STATUS to 
> mention the other change.

I don't think that was what Greg meant, but he can speak for himself ;)

In any case, I think that all 2.0 patches deserve explicit eyeballing,
no matter how trivial.  I agree that the whole STATUS route is totally
overkill for trivial patches as these.

Sander

Mime
View raw message