Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18102 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 15:46:32 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2003 15:46:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 34063 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2003 15:46:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34020 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2003 15:46:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 34007 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 15:46:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (64.4.11.104) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Nov 2003 15:46:21 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 07:46:24 -0800 Received: from 200.181.172.100 by by7fd.bay7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:46:23 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.181.172.100] X-Originating-Email: [haskellboy@hotmail.com] From: "Haskell Curry" To: dev@httpd.apache.org Bcc: Subject: Re: child connection ? Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 15:46:23 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Nov 2003 15:46:24.0360 (UTC) FILETIME=[C889B680:01C3B10F] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ok man, thanks a lot :) >From: Jeff Trawick >Reply-To: trawick@attglobal.net >To: dev@httpd.apache.org >Subject: Re: child connection ? >Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 10:44:36 -0500 > >Haskell Curry wrote: > >>does the child not schedule the request of a same connection !? > >A subsequent request on the same connection will be handled by the same >thread that handled the first request on that connection. > >>like >>[computer A] ----connection---> [computer B] >>[computer A] <-------ack----------- [computer B] >>[computer A] ------request 1---->[computer B] >>[computer A] ------request 2----->[computer B] >> >>the child has the "request 1" and "request 2", how does the child >>schedule them !? or the chil process "request 1" and after that >>"request 2" or the child can put "request 1" in a thread and >>"request 2" into another. > >the requests are processed serially on the same thread... Apache will not >start processing another request from same conneciton on another thread >while it continues to process the first request > > _________________________________________________________________ MSN Hotmail, o maior webmail do Brasil. http://www.hotmail.com