httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: consider reopening 1.3
Date Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:18:47 GMT
Glenn wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:46:26PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Why 1.4? What will 1.4 have that 1.3 does not? Or do you mean
> > reopening 1.3 implies that it becomes 1.4?
> 
> Only semantics.  .4 is even, so stable; .5 is development and less stable
> 

Personally, I've never liked that methodology.... Unless *really*
controlled, I think it almost restricts development, since the 1.5
tree kind of gets "super developed" and only occasionally are
"safe things" brought down to 1.4. Other development teams
do this much better than we do, IMO. With our development
scenario, and they way we are structured (no benevolent dictator),
having one tree, which is developed and polished, seems almost
healthier.

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message