httpd-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Any votes on this??
Date Mon, 20 Oct 2003 19:49:54 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> 
> At 01:53 PM 10/20/2003, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> >On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> >>    * isn't ap_die() broken with recognizing recursive errors
> >>        Message-Id: <3F8C56E3.8050501@attglobal.net>
> >>         +1: jeff, jim
> >
> >I looked at it and it seemed reasonable but it stretches far enough beyond
> >the bounds of my knowledge of its implications that I decided not to vote.
> >Consider this a +0.
> 
> I'm afraid I'm so far away from 1.3 that I'm in Cliff's boat, a strong +0 :)
> Have you had a chance to run it through the perl-framework testsuite?
> If so I'd give it +.5.
> 

Yes and it passes. The rub is that it changes behavior of
modules that may be doing the "wrong thing" and I'm not sure
if I wish to do that at this stage...

Jeff, would it be OK if we skip this for 1.3.29 and potentially
add it in for 1.3.30?

-- 
===========================================================================
   Jim Jagielski   [|]   jim@jaguNET.com   [|]   http://www.jaguNET.com/
      "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order
             will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson

Mime
View raw message