Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10474 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 14:23:09 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 14:23:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 15243 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 14:21:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 15109 invoked by uid 500); 3 Sep 2003 14:21:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 14969 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2003 14:21:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Boron.MeepZor.Com) (204.146.167.214) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2003 14:21:01 -0000 Received: from wstoddard.com (dmz-firewall [206.199.198.4]) by Boron.MeepZor.Com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h83EKFq04215 for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:20:15 -0400 Message-ID: <3F55F88E.2080908@wstoddard.com> Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 10:19:58 -0400 From: Bill Stoddard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: apache 1.3.27 64bit on Solaris8... References: <41256D96.0049D0BF.00@esrinmail3.esrin.esa.int> In-Reply-To: <41256D96.0049D0BF.00@esrinmail3.esrin.esa.int> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Stefano.Zanasco@esa.int wrote: Just out of curiosity, why are you not using Apache 2.0, which solves this problem nicely. Bill