Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29554 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 21:47:40 -0000 Received: from daedalus.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (208.185.179.12) by minotaur-2.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 21:47:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 3068 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2003 21:47:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3031 invoked by uid 500); 16 Sep 2003 21:47:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 3010 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2003 21:47:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 21:47:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 8450 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Sep 2003 21:47:24 -0000 Received: from p50925972.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO wstst06) (80.146.89.114) by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 16 Sep 2003 23:47:24 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1766531 Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 23:46:01 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnter_Knauf?= Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCnter_Knauf?= To: dev@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: apache-1.3/src/main rfc1413.c Message-ID: <0eb7AnPBljVqpp0SN5rmlxBR7XDdShg9BhEs0CnaHfI@akmail> References: <20030916202812.2582.qmail@minotaur.apache.org> <5.2.0.9.2.20030916153756.01ec9cc0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: AK-Mail 3.5 [ger] (registered, single user license) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: minotaur-2.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N > Didn't you just introduce thread-safety issues? > IIRC ident wasn't thread safe. oops, sorry about that, but I wasnt aware of this. So what would you suggest? perhaps backport the rfc1413.c from the 2.0 sources?? thanks, Guenter.