Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31583 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2003 19:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 31530 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2003 19:02:07 -0000 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.1 Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2003 13:02:01 -0600 From: "Brad Nicholes" To: , Subject: Re: About time to do 2.0.48? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 500/1000/N Cliff, Do any of these funky bucket issues have anything to do with the bucket_max_alloc() functionality that we have talked about in the past? It would really be nice to be able to control the bucket allocations. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com >>> jwoolley@virginia.edu Friday, August 08, 2003 11:37:39 AM >>> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Sander Striker wrote: > I envision tagging somewhere next (mid) week, following > release 1 or 2 weeks after that. I'm starting to think it might be nice if we can push this back to say Thursday instead of Tuesday-ish as was suggested last night... I reeeeally want to wrap these (now three) funky bucket problems (Bojan's, Ron's, and Glenn's), and I just plain won't have time to work on them until Monday. --Cliff