Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87688 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2003 18:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 87608 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2003 18:04:43 -0000 Message-ID: <161E04AB9955D54E826FD86360578554D2741E@169.32.17.10.nat.cnet.com> From: Ron Park To: "'Cliff Woolley'" , "'dev@httpd.apache.org'" , Ron Park Subject: RE: Two mod_include problems Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:04:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2656.59) Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Yes, this is the patch we tried. > -----Original Message----- > From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:jwoolley@virginia.edu] > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 1:25 PM > To: dev@httpd.apache.org; Ron Park > Subject: RE: Two mod_include problems > > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Ron Park wrote: > > > Unfortunately, it seems your patch from 07/12/03 does > > not work on our pages. :( We haven't yet tracked down > > *how* it's not working though. More info to follow. > > Which patch, specifically? The one I'm looking at right now > is Andre's > patch that has the following snippet in it: > > + apr_bucket *stop = (!tmp_dptr && ctx->state > == PARSE_HEAD) > + ? ctx->head_start_bucket > + : tmp_dptr; > > Just want to make sure we're on the same page. > > --Cliff >