Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 302 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jun 2003 20:25:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 289 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2003 20:25:13 -0000 From: "Marc M. Adkins" To: Subject: AddHandler scope Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 14:05:56 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Apache 2.0.46, W2K I've been working on a module and quite unexpectedly I found that my AddHandler directive was taking affect at a global level even though it was defined within a virtual host block. So it was affecting Apache manual pages that weren't in the virtual host for which I had created the AddHandler directive. Am I misunderstanding the scope of AddHandler? I am using named virtual host. For testing I have all of the named hosts defined in my HOSTS file to point to 127.0.0.1. So in a sense it all goes to the same place. I wouldn't have thought that would have made a difference. mma