Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-httpd-dev-archive@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 40906 invoked by uid 500); 11 Jun 2003 18:12:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@httpd.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk Reply-To: dev@httpd.apache.org list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@httpd.apache.org Received: (qmail 40874 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2003 18:12:12 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030611125559.02c147a0@pop3.rowe-clan.net> X-Sender: admin%rowe-clan.net@pop3.rowe-clan.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:56:52 -0500 To: dev@httpd.apache.org From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.1: OPENSSL_load_builtin_modules missing in openSSL-0.9.6* Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20030611131823.GA16359@deejai2.mch.fsc.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jun 2003 18:12:13.0938 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBF25D20:01C33044] X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I didn't see an attached patch, but I've committed the change to look for OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta1 or later before we try to use that function. Thanks, and sorry I dropped this on the floor too long... Bill At 08:18 AM 6/11/2003, Martin Kraemer wrote: >I fail to link mod_ssl because the symbol OPENSSL_load_builtin_modules() >is only present in OpenSSL-0.9.7*, not in -0.9.6* > >Is the appended patch sufficient, or is the invocation required for >anything else beyond initialization of OpenSSL? > > Martin >-- > | Fujitsu Siemens >Fon: +49-89-636-46021, FAX: +49-89-636-47655 | 81730 Munich, Germany